BETA
Early release — we are building new features fast, you may encounter issues. Help us improve:
contact us
to report bugs or share feedback.
Loading...
Equity Desk
Earnings Calendar
IPO Calendar
Screener
Analyst Consensus
Smart Money
Insider Activity
Short Interest
Analytics
Equity Analytics
←
Back to Equity Analytics
Equity Analytics
/
6488.TWO
6488.TWO
GlobalWafers Co., Ltd.
Technology - TW
GlobalWafers Co., Ltd. manufactures and sells semiconductor silicon ingots and wafers worldwide. The company produces silicon ingots; polished wafers; annealed wafers; epitaxial wafers; diffusion wafers; compound semiconductor wafers includ…
Show more
HQ: Hsinchu City, TP, Taiwan, Province of China
www.sas-globalwafers.com
TWD
630.00
+1.29%
vs prev. close
Overview
Fundamentals
Ownership & Activity
Analyst Consensus
Seasonality & Patterns
News
Research
Performance
1W
+23.05%
1M
-38.24%
3M
-37.62%
1Y
+62.37%
YTD
+55.17%
Valuation
P/E
30.6
EPS TTM
20.57
Dividend yield
1.22%
Size and risk
Market cap
$10.1B
Beta
2.16
Price history
6488.TWO price
TWD
Line
Candle
Volume
Total return
Events
Vs index
Log scale
1m
3m
6m
1y
3y
5y
10y
max
Loading…
Next earnings
Report date
EPS estimate
Revenue estimate
Peer comparison
Valuation & performance
Risk
GlobalWafers
6488.TWO
Semiconductors
Mkt cap (USD bn)
10.1
P/E
30.6
Div yld
1.22%
1W
+23.1%
1M
-38.2%
3M
-37.6%
6M
-11.3%
1Y
+62.4%
YTD
+55.2%
Company
Ticker
Industry
Mkt cap (USD bn)
P/
E
Div yld
1W
1M
3M
6M
1Y
YTD
GlobalWafers
6488.TWO
Semiconductors
10.1
30.6
1.22%
+23.1%
-38.2%
-37.6%
-11.3%
+62.4%
+55.2%
Subscribe to Equity Analytics to compare 6488.TWO with its closest peers
Sector-matched peer set with side-by-side valuation, dividend and performance over every window.
View plans
Ask Ashenden
Ask, then keep asking: it follows the conversation for 30 minutes, grounded in Ashenden research.
Ask
Built on Ashenden research and our own data. Answers are AI-generated: they can be wrong or incomplete — check anything you would act on.
Is 6488.TWO cheap or expensive against its peers, and what justifies the gap?
What does the price already assume about 6488.TWO?
What would have to go wrong for 6488.TWO from here?
Why 6488.TWO now, and not a year ago?