BETA
Early release — we are building new features fast, you may encounter issues. Help us improve:
contact us
to report bugs or share feedback.
Loading...
Equity Desk
Earnings Calendar
IPO Calendar
Screener
Analyst Consensus
Smart Money
Insider Activity
Short Interest
Analytics
Equity Analytics
←
Back to Equity Analytics
Equity Analytics
/
3099.T
3099.T
Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Ltd.
Consumer Cyclical - JP
Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Ltd. (3099.T) operates as a holding company primarily engaged in the department store business through its wholly owned subsidiaries Isetan Co. Ltd. and Mitsukoshi Ltd.; it also conducts credit and finance activit…
Show more
HQ: Shinjuku-ku, Japan
www.imhds.co.jp
JPY
1,839.50
+2.51%
vs prev. close
Overview
Fundamentals
Ownership & Activity
Analyst Consensus
Seasonality & Patterns
News
Research
Performance
1W
+12.85%
1M
+6.51%
3M
+3.69%
1Y
+46.43%
YTD
+61.71%
Valuation
P/E
15.9
EPS TTM
115.70
Dividend yield
2.23%
Size and risk
Market cap
$7.9B
Beta
0.15
Price history
3099.T price
JPY
Line
Candle
Volume
Total return
Events
Vs index
Log scale
1m
3m
6m
1y
3y
5y
10y
max
Loading…
Next earnings
Report date
EPS estimate
Revenue estimate
Peer comparison
Valuation & performance
Risk
Isetan Mitsukoshi
3099.T
Department Stores
Mkt cap (USD bn)
7.9
P/E
15.9
Div yld
2.23%
1W
+12.8%
1M
+6.5%
3M
+3.7%
6M
+11.4%
1Y
+46.4%
YTD
+61.7%
Company
Ticker
Industry
Mkt cap (USD bn)
P/
E
Div yld
1W
1M
3M
6M
1Y
YTD
Isetan Mitsukoshi
3099.T
Department Stores
7.9
15.9
2.23%
+12.8%
+6.5%
+3.7%
+11.4%
+46.4%
+61.7%
Subscribe to Equity Analytics to compare 3099.T with its closest peers
Sector-matched peer set with side-by-side valuation, dividend and performance over every window.
View plans
Ask Ashenden
Ask, then keep asking: it follows the conversation for 30 minutes, grounded in Ashenden research.
Ask
Built on Ashenden research and our own data. Answers are AI-generated: they can be wrong or incomplete — check anything you would act on.
Is 3099.T cheap or expensive against its peers, and what justifies the gap?
What does the price already assume about 3099.T?
What would have to go wrong for 3099.T from here?
Why 3099.T now, and not a year ago?